I’m looking at a map of northern Ontario’s Ring of Fire. It’s a pretty patchwork of colours in the shape of a crescent moon: deep sea-blue for Freewest Resources, orange for KWG, bright sun-yellow for Probe, grass green for Fancamp, sky-blue for the Freewest/Spider/KWG partnership.
They are some of the thousands of claims staked by mining companies in the Ring of Fire—5,120 square kilometres in the water sheds of Hudson and James Bays and chock full of chromite, nickel, copper and zinc worth well over $100 billion. That’s a sizable chunk of boreal forest, itself a carbon sink of the order of the Amazon rain forest.
Imagine you are on the shore of McFaulds Lake. You’re looking at trees and rock and muskeg—swampland—millions of acres of it. Turn around and you’ll see KWG’s base camp and maybe a drill or two pulling up core samples of chromite.
Well why not? you ask. There’s nothing there. No so. It’s home for everyone from black flies to black bears to First Nations peoples, Cree and Anishinaabek, whose ways of life will be forever altered if and when all those pretty coloured claims become mines.
Some people are growing impatient for those mines. Keith Hobbs, the mayor of Thunder Bay says “Everybody can get rich on this. … We’re tired of hearing, ‘It’s going to happen, it’s going to happen.’ It needs to happen.”
Think Ontario’s oil sands. Thunder Bay is Fort McMurray—an analogy Mr Hobbs himself uses.
Everyone, including the Mayor, wants to “do it right.” But doing it right is where everything can go wrong. Mining companies, rightly, want to make a profit. Shareholders, rightly, want a healthy return on their investment. Municipalities want jobs and new infrastructure. The Crown wants royalties (and votes). Environmentalists want to preserve the environment.
First Nations want all these things. They are not opposed to development as long as it doesn’t turn the land inside out. So, they are banking their future on fair and proper consultation.
In making the law on consultation, the Supreme Court of Canada said, done right, it will lead to reconciliation between Canada and Turtle Island. But reconciliation demands accord between peoples of very different cultures and status. And that requires trust where there is none, and a kind of understanding that must go far beyond tolerance, which itself is in short supply. It demands legislative flexibility where the law is becoming more hidebound and ideological. It will take enormous patience from a public impatient with Turtle Island’s impoverished circumstances and First Nations’ demands for relief from those circumstances.
Into this ring of fire walks Bob Rae. He is now the lead negotiator for the Matawa Tribal Council, nine Anishinaabe First Nations in the area most directly impacted by the thousands of claims on the road to becoming mines.
“The elders talk to me of the overwhelming importance of the environment,” he told me in a recent interview, “and their deep concern about the long term challenges resource development will bring to the region. But they are also concerned about the pattern of dependence and despondency that has taken over their communities. They remember the time of making a living on the land. That life is now increasingly difficult.”
“The question of an adequate and impartial process has to be on the table. Matawa’s concerns about existing processes are a matter of public record. It’s very early days in discussions with the Province, but I’m satisfied that Mr Iacobucci [Ontario’s negotiator] wants the same.”
“The by-products of chromium mining are very hazardous to the environment and to people. We are mindful that the oil sands expansion was allowed by a federal Environmental Assessment in spite of its acknowledgement of environmental degradation.”
And that begs a crucial question: where is the federal Crown? Where’s the Harper Government? “I haven’t heard from the federal government directly,” said Mr Rae. “Our goal right now is to engage the Province. However, from the federal perspective, the EA process has been badly weakened.”
The feds were last seen opposing Matawa’s attempt to introduce expert evidence during a Judicial Review of the government’s decision to hold a Comprehensive Environmental Assessment on a Cliffs Resources project. That process would exclude effective participation from First Nations. Cliffs (an American chromium mining company) brought a similar motion. Matawa won that round. A decision on the legitimacy of the EA is expected in September.
Bob Rae is probably the best man for the job: smart with the political heft for talks with government, the respect of Canadians, and the support of First Nations people I talked to. As Anishinaabe author and linguist Basil Johnston put it, “His head and his heart are both in the right place.”
Now, I know he’s is not the only one on his side of the table. And I know that the Anishinaabek have a way of mapping out their own path whether we like it or not. Nevertheless, one of those ridiculous old high school football chants has dogged me since our first conversation.
“Rae! Rae! He’s our man. If he can’t do it no one can.”
And that’s what frightens me.
© David McLaren, July 2013
Originally in Sunmedia papers, Forum, 20 July 2013
Abstract for TR-546 – Sodium Dichromate Dihydrate (CASRN 7789-12-0)Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Sodium Dichromate Dihydrate (CAS No. 7789-12-0) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Drinking Water Studies)
Chemical Formula: Na2Cr2O7 • 2H2O - Molecular Weight: 298.0
Synonyms: Chromic acid; dichromic acid, dihydrate; disodium dichromate dihydrate; chromium VI
Sodium dichromate dihydrate is one of a number of inorganic compounds containing hexavalent chromium (Cr VI) found in drinking water source supplies as a contaminant resulting from various industrial processes including electroplating operations, leather tanning, and textile manufacturing. Because of the lack of adequate experimental data on the toxicity and carcinogenicity of hexavalent chromium ingested orally and because hexavalent chromium has been found in drinking water source supplies, the California Congressional Delegation, the California Environmental Protection Agency, and the California Department of Health Services nominated hexavalent chromium to the National Toxicology Program for study. Results of 3-month toxicity studies in F344/N rats and B6C3F1, BALB/c, and am3-C57BL/6 mice were reported earlier in NTP Toxicty Report 72. In the current study, male and female F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice were exposed to sodium dichromate dihydrate (greater than 99.7% pure) in drinking water for 2 years.
Under the conditions of these 2-year drinking water studies, there was clear evidence of carcinogenic activity of sodium dichromate dihydrate in male and female F344/N rats based on increased incidences of squamous cell neoplasms of the oral cavity. There was clear evidence of carcinogenic activity of sodium dichromate dihydrate in male and female B6C3F1 mice based on increased incidences of neoplasms of the small intestine (duodenum, jejunum, or ileum).
Exposure to sodium dichromate dihydrate resulted in histiocytic cellular infiltration in the liver, small intestine, and pancreatic and mesenteric lymph nodes of rats and mice and diffuse epithelial hyperplasia in the small intestine of male and female mice.
Link to the full study report in PDF.
Previous Post, February 2013: http://jdavidmclaren.wordpress.com/2013/02/18/mordor-on/
Matawa First Nations Tribal Council: http://www.matawa.on.ca/
Impacts of mining on First Nations’ health: www.pimatisiwin.com/online/?page_id=147